Statement by H.E. Dr. R.M. Marty M. Natalegawa, Indonesian Foreign Minister, Chair of ASEAN, Before the UNSC, New York, 14 February 2011

Red In USA

http://www.internetfreedom.us/thread-13862.html

Red In USA

http://www.internetfreedom.us/thread-13888.html

Red In USA

http://www.internetfreedom.us/thread-13892.html

Red In USA

http://www.internetfreedom.us/thread-13713.html

Red In USA

วันที่ 17 กุมภาพันธ์ พ.ศ. 2554 ปีที่ 20 ฉบับที่ 7385 ข่าวสดรายวัน

สายไปแล้ว

คอลัมน์ ทิ้งหมัดเข้ามุม

เภรี กุลาธรรม

พรรคประชาธิปัตย์ถนัดทางด่า โต้ตอบ โต้เถียงอยู่แล้ว

จึงไม่แปลกที่คนในพรรค พร้อมที่จะเรียงหน้าออกมา

น.พ.บุรณัชย์ สมุทรักษ์ โฆษกตัวจริง ก็สามารถวิเคราะห์ ตอบโต้ได้หมด ตั้งแต่ก้นมหา สมุทรจนถึงจักรวาล

หมอวรงค์ เดชวิกรม รองโฆษกก็ใช่ย่อยในเรื่องต่อปากต่อคำ

แม้แต่ระดับส.ส.ก็ฉายแววประชาธิปัตย์สไตล์ได้อย่างดี

นายวัชระ เพชรทอง นายอรรถพร พลบุตร นายบุญรอด สุขถิ่นไทย นายอรรถวิชญ์ สุวรรณภักดี และอีกหลายๆ คน ก็ถอดแบบกันมา

ไม่นับโฆษกประจำตัวหัวหน้าพรรค แม้จะถูกคนส่ายหน้าแค่ไหนก็ไม่เป็นไร ขอเพียงให้มีพื้นที่ข่าวก็พอ

ถูกด่าก็ได้ เพื่อให้ได้เป็นข่าว

ล่าสุด ก็กรณีด่าเปรียบเปรยสมเด็จฮุนเซน เป็น "จะแกลวบคำ" ปฏิบัติการกับไทยแบบสุนัขลอบกัด

ช่วงที่ผ่านมา ชาวภูมิซรอลและบ้านใกล้เคียงบริเวณแนวชายแดน ต้องอพยพหลบหนี

นายอภิสิทธิ์ เวชชาชีวะ นายกรัฐมนตรี ถูกตำหนิว่าเพิกเฉยละเลย ไม่ไปเยี่ยมเยียน

กระบอกเสียงหัวหน้าพรรค ก็ออกมาชี้แจงแทนว่าถ้าหากนายกฯ ไป ก็อาจจะเป็นการยั่วยุทหารเขมรไปโน่น

สุดท้ายก็เลยได้แค่นั่งหน้าจอประชุมทางไกล ถามไถ่ชาวบ้านพอถูๆ ไถๆ

อย่างไรก็ตาม ปัญหาชายแดนที่ปะทุขึ้นมา

นายอภิสิทธิ์จะลอยตัว จะอ้างว่าสมเด็จฮุนเซนต้องการยกระดับปัญหาขึ้นมา เพื่อให้สหประชาชาติเข้ามาให้ได้

เพราะส่วนหนึ่ง เกิดมาจากคนใกล้ชิดข้ามแดนไปถูกจับ แล้วบอกนายกฯ รู้คนเดียว

นายอภิสิทธิ์พูดจาข่มขู่เพื่อนบ้านอย่างไรบ้าง ย่อมรู้แก่ใจดี

พอมีเหตุการณ์สู้รบสูญเสียขึ้นมา ก็ยังโหนกระแสคลั่งชาติ

บอกไทยรักสงบ แต่ถึงรบไม่ขลาดหน้าตาเฉย

การที่นายอภิสิทธิ์รีๆ รอๆ ไม่ ไปดูแลชาวบ้านด้วยตัวเองทันที

ถือว่าสูญเสียภาวะผู้นำ ไม่ได้ใจชาวบ้าน

ครั้นจะขยับไปตอนนี้ก็สายไป แม้จะมีเหตุปะทะอีกรอบก็ตาม

เพราะพ่อเมืองศรีสะเกษล้ำหน้าไปไกล ถึงขนาดไปนอนที่ภูมิซรอลแล้ว

Red In USA

แถลงการณ์กรณีข้อพิพาทระหว่างไทยและกัมพูชาที่กรุงนิวยอร์คเมื่อวันที่ 14 กพ.54
ฝากไว้เป็นหลักฐาน
สำหรับผู้ที่สนใจติดตามพัฒนาการ สงครามการทูตระหว่างไทย-กัมพูชา

คำแถลงของ ประธาน UNSC
[Image: ?di=1512979061303]

คำแถลงของ Dr. Marty Natalegawa รมต.ต่างประเทศอินโดนีเซีย
ในฐานะประธาน ASEAN
http://www.kemlu.go.id/Pages/SpeechTrans...P=701&l=en

Statement by H.E. Dr. R.M. Marty M. Natalegawa, Indonesian Foreign Minister, Chair of ASEAN, Before the UNSC, New York, 14 February 2011

Monday, 14 February 2011

Statement by H.E. Dr. R.M. Marty M. Natalegawa
Foreign Minister of the Republic of Indonesia
Chair of the

Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)
Before the Security Council of the United Nations on
Agenda item: Letter dated 6 February 2011 from the Permanent Representative of Cambodia to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council

New York, 14 February 2011

Madame President,

Permit me to begin, by congratulating you on your assumption of the Presidency of the Security Council for the month of February; and to express our firm belief that, under your able leadership, the Council would be able to continue effectively discharge its Charter-mandated responsibilities.

Madame President,

The Council has just heard the views of the parties in the case: namely, Cambodia and Thailand.

Both on the root cause of the differences among them, namely the border dispute, as well the circumstances surrounding the most recent border clashes on 4-6 February 2011.

Indeed, on 7-8 February 2011, through my visit to both Phnom Penh and Bangkok, I had the opportunity to hear first hand from the parties concerned on the issues confronting them.

Let me at this juncture, therefore, express deep appreciation to my colleagues, His Excellency Mr. Hor Namhong, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of the Kingdom of Cambodia, and His Excellency Mr. Kasit Piromya, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Thailand, for their active engagement with Indonesia, Chairman of ASEAN.

Madame President,

There's little doubt about the complexity of the border issue confronting Thailand and Cambodia.

However, and I wish to emphasize this point, there is absolutely no reason why the issue can not be resolved through peaceful means; through dialogue and negotiations.

As Chair of ASEAN, Indonesia is of the view, Madame President, that there is nothing inevitable about a military solution to the two countries' border issue.

Indeed, without in any way underestimating the challenges before us, as chair of ASEAN, Indonesia detects still a window of opportunity.

From my discussions in Bangkok and Phnom Penh, Indonesia obtained three basic impressions or conclusions.

I have shared these with the two countries concerned and the other ASEAN member states.

None have disassociated itself from these conclusions.

First, Indonesia as chair of ASEAN, believes that ultimately there exists a continued desire and commitment by both sides to settle their differences through peaceful means.

Thus said, this is certainly consistent with the basic undertaking all ASEAN member countries have made as reflected in the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation (TAC) and its Charter. Through these core ASEAN documents, all ASEAN member states, Thailand and Cambodia included, pledged to settle their differences or disputes by peaceful means, and to renounce aggression, and of the threat or use of force.

ASEAN is determined to ensure that this basic commitment is upheld by the two parties concerned.

Support by the Security Council, a call for the parties to resolve the dispute by peaceful means, in accordance with the TAC and the ASEAN Charter, would, Indonesia believes, be constructive.

Second, Indonesia as chair of ASEAN, believes that both sides recognize the need to stabilize the situation on the ground; to ensure that the ceasefire holds.

The recent communications from the two governments to the Security Council, as well as the statements just now made by the distinguished Foreign Ministers, illustrate well the differing interpretations of the circumstances surrounding the recent border incidents.

Each side professes its defensive and peaceful intent; apportioning to the other responsibility for provoking the border incidents.

However, intent must be accurately deciphered. Confidence and trust build on the ground.

The recent military incidents illustrate that, at the very least, there is a communication gap; of perceptions and misperceptions.

Leading to, perhaps, a cycle of unintended violence and conflict.

There is, thus, a need to build a more reliable local and higher level communications system between the two sides, perhaps with third party support, to ensure that the ceasefire holds. To foster confidence in each others' commitment to hold the ceasefire and to remove self-fulfilling worst scenario action and counter reaction. Not least, there is an obvious need for the two sides to make a higher level political commitment to respect the ceasefire.

The Security Council may wish to join in calling on the two sides to respect and to adhere to the ceasefire and to support ASEAN's endeavour in this regard.

Madame President,

Commitment to address the issue by peaceful means and commitment to respect the ceasefire; these are essential if we are to create conditions conducive for diplomatic negotiations to take place.

This is the third impression Indonesia came away with from the visit I undertook last 7-8 February 2011.

We have all been here before.

Debate on the efficacy of bilateral as opposed to regional and indeed, global solutions to a protracted conflict and dispute.

One party in the present dispute has professed preference to a bilateral resolution to the issue.

The other appears to lack faith in the efficacy of such approach.

In truth, bilateral and regional, and indeed, global efforts, do not have to be seen as exclusive to one another, nor are they an "either/or" choices; rather they can be made complementary and mutually reinforcing.

Bilateral negotiation and agreement are prerequisites. In the final analysis, there is no substitute to such an agreement; not least, when it relates to border issues.

However, regional support, or facilitation, are invaluable in helping create conditions conducive for such bilateral talks; to remove distrust, enhance confidence in the process and indeed to assure respect of the outcome.

ASEAN can thus make valuable contribution.

The Security Council may wish to express support for ASEAN's efforts, to facilitate and actively encourage, the two sides to step up efforts to resolve their disputes by peaceful means.

Madame President,

What’s next?

In anticipation of the outcome of the present Security Council meeting, as Chair of ASEAN, Indonesia has called for a meeting of the Foreign Ministers of ASEAN member states in Jakarta on 22 February 2011.

Indonesia is very much encouraged that both Cambodia and Thailand readily and at once agreed to the convening of the meeting.

Based on the communications I have had, Indonesia foresees three basic and mutually reinforcing objectives:

First, an ASEAN call and, indeed, strong encouragement, to the parties concerned to continue to commit to the peaceful settlement of disputes and renunciation of the use and threat of the use of force, as provided for in the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation and its Charter;

Second, an ASEAN support to the efforts by the two parties to ensure respect of the ceasefire. Enhanced communications modalities may need to be contemplated and introduced; and

Third, an ASEAN effort to ensure conducive climate for the resumption of negotiations between the two sides. ASEAN may facilitate such talks and be informed by the parties concerned on the general outline of its progress.

The Council may wish to express support for the aforementioned ASEAN Foreign Ministers meeting.

Madame President,

Southeast Asia is a region much transformed. Our region is only too painfully aware of the costs of conflict. It is, at the same, cognizant of the dividends accruing from conditions of amity and cooperation. Common security means common prosperity and common progress.

We are not about to let these gains lapse.

ASEAN has been at the forefront in catapulting the region to an ASEAN Community by 2015. In all its three pillars, namely economic, socio-cultural and political-security. In such Community, resort to use of force to settle disputes cannot be the norm. It is an exceptional and unique aberration; as we believe the current situation between Cambodia and Thailand.

Indeed, despite this most recent challenge between such two principal members within ASEAN, cooperation within ASEAN, between ASEAN and it's immediate regions, through the "plus one" and "plus three" processes, as well as the East Asia Summit, have continued unabated. ASEAN is occupying the driving seat role in the wider region's architecture building.

Beyond, in accordance with ASEAN's theme for 2011: "ASEAN community in a global community of nations", ASEAN is identifying a roadmap for a more enhanced contribution on global affairs: an ASEAN common platform on global issues of common concern.

ASEAN as a net contributor to the solution of many of the world's problems.

In short, Madame President, ASEAN has every incentive to ensure that the present difficulties afflicting two of its members be resolved amicably.

Guns and artillery must remain silent in Southeast Asia.

Madame President,

Thus, we ask for synergy of efforts by the Security Council to support ASEAN's endeavours and ultimately, to support and provide every positive incentive for the two parties concerned, Cambodia and Thailand, to resolve their differences amicably, as befitting members of the ASEAN family of nations; and indeed, members of the global community of nations.

Thank you very much, Madame President.

แถมด้วยบทวิเคราะห์ ของบางกอกโพสต์
http://www.bangkokpost.com/print/221803/

Split decision, with both claiming victory

Was the UNSC's ruling on the border conflict a win, loss, or draw for Thailand? It depends who you ask.

Published: 16/02/2011 at 12:00 AM
Newspaper section: News

Immediately after the United Nations Security Council called on Thailand and Cambodia to implement a permanent ceasefire and to resolve their border dispute ''peacefully and through effective dialogue'', each side claimed victory.

But who actually won, and what did they win?

Cambodia says the UNSC's call made no mention of bilateral mechanisms to resolve the dispute, which Thailand has insisted upon since the start of the dispute that escalated into armed clashes.

Phnom Penh also claimed success in raising the issue before the UNSC with Cambodian Foreign Minister Hor Namhong continuing to insist that bilateral talks would not work and adding that ''all negotiations must always have the participation of a third party''.

Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva said: ''When the international community thinks the problem should be solved through negotiations, Cambodia has no reason to refuse. They should return to the [bilateral] talks.''

As far as negotiations are concerned, technically Cambodia is right.While the UNSC did respond to Phnom Penh's call for a permanent ceasefire, it did not react to its call for the deployment of UN peacekeepers to act as a buffer in the disputed zone.

The UNSC did not specifically mention bilateral mechanisms. It mentioned in stead ''restraint, dialogue and support for Asean's efforts''.

But United Nations secretary-general Ban Ki-moon on Monday referred to the use of ''existing mechanisms'', which means all mechanisms in existence _ including bilateral ones _ to resolve the dispute peacefully.

The UNSC's position on Monday was in fact a statement by its president, Brazilian ambassador Maria Luiza Ribeiro Viotti.

There was no UNSC resolution, and the council president's statement is not binding, but it carries moral authority because it reflects the unanimous view of council members.

''Both sides get a bit of what they were looking for, but not a full loaf,'' a senior Asean figure told the Bangkok Post.

''In this kind of diplomatic game, it is rare that one side gets everything and the other side gets nothing.

''Both sides can claim a victory and call on the other side to fulfil what was left undetermined.''

The analyst noted that, in 2008, Cambodia raised the border issue at the Asean Ministerial Meeting in Singapore. Thailand resisted, insisting the dispute be resolved bilaterally.

Thailand did the same thing last week when Asean chair and Indonesian Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa visited both countries.

But the UNSC clearly stated on Monday that it supported Asean's role in the resolution of the dispute.

Thailand is now saying it agrees to a regional parley ''in support'' of a bilateral process, the analyst said.

While Cambodia did not get the UN to stand guard between the Thai troops and its soldiers on the border, it did manage to raise the issue with the UNSC _ the highest security forum of the international community, said an Asean observer in Singapore.

''The call for Asean to help resolve the conflicts could be seen as a victory of sorts for Cambodia,'' the observer said.

''If it has not fully internationalised the dispute, it has at least regionalised it. And the record at the UNSC is a comforting guarantee that if anything goes badly wrong again, the UNSC is bound to take it up more readily again.''

The question now is what lies ahead.

Mr Marty alluded to this challenge on Monday when he said ''the issue here is to extract a clear commitment from Thailand and Cambodia for a peaceful resolution'', indicating the Asean meeting would put pressure on the two countries to reach an agreement.

He said Mr Kasit and Hor Namhong had ''professed peaceful intent'' before the council and that the Asean foreign ministers meeting in Jakarta next week should ''flesh it out''.

According to a senior Asean diplomat, Asean faces fresh challenges following the appeal by the UNSC on Monday in New York.

Asean must come up with a minimum consensus on how to respond to the call.

''This is a historic first for Asean,'' the senior Asean diplomat said.

Under articles 52 and 53 of the UN Charter, the UNSC is allowed to delegate and share responsibility with regional organisations to help resolve conflicts.

''Asean will have to decide what are the best mechanisms to put in place to ensure the ceasefire will hold and that no more violence shall erupt,'' the senior diplomat said.

The question is whether a monitoring mechanism of sorts is acceptable to Thailand and Cambodia, as well as the other member states who would be averse to involvement in external political and security issues.

Asean will also have to put its own charter pertaining to dispute settlement mechanisms (Articles 22 and 23) into full implementation.

These articles call for establishment of permanent dispute settlement mechanisms in all areas in anticipation of the establishment of the Asean economic community by 2015.

There is an urgent need for a final arbiter to adjudicate conflicts likely to occur in a more integrated community.

It will have to accept that it needs a programme of capacity-building for ''good offices, conciliation and mediation'', as dictated by the charter.

This will not be the last time that Asean will have to respond to such challenges and the international community will expect the grouping to play a mediating role among its own.

The senior Asean diplomat said: ''This is a turning point for Asean in its transformation to a rule-based organisation.''

Success or failure in Jakarta to respond to the UNSC's appeal and to make advances for a permanent dispute mechanism, or at least agree to a road map towards this goal, not only depends on Thailand and Cambodia but on all of its members.

Both Thailand and Cambodia can win in Jakarta. But, more importantly, the resolution of this dispute would mean Asean wins as well.

By the same token, failure by both countries to talk would mean Asean as a whole fails as well, not only as far as the UNSC appeal is concerned but in terms of being able to rise to the occasion and shoulder the responsibilities it has volunteered to take on according to its own aspirations enshrined in its own charter.

สรุปรวมๆ งานนี้อาเซียนเข้ามาเกี่ยวข้องด้วยแน่นอน
เป้าหมายของกัมพูชาคือ ต้องการให้มีตัวแทนอาเซียนเข้าร่วมในประชุมระหว่างไทย-กัมพูชา ทุกระดับรวมทั้ง JBC ด้วย
และจะขอให้มีผู้สังเกตุการณ์ของอาเซียนไปประจำในพื้นที่ขัดแย้ง

ดาวน์โหลดคลิ๊ปคนเสื้อแดง

วันพฤหัสบดีที่ 17 กุมภาพันธ์ พ.ศ. 2554

ภาพชุดโชคดีที่ได้เกิดมาเป็นคนเกาหลีเหนือ เฉลิมฉลองวันเกิด69ปีท่านผู้นำอันเป็นที่รัก คิมจองอิล

ของดีเลยมาสายหน่อย นี่ไงพบแล้วหลักฐานต้นเหตุไทยรบเขมร ไก่อูมีอะไรจะแถ-ลง ลวงโลกอีกมั้ย?!

ข่าวเต้า ข่าวลวง แต่ก็อ่านไว้หน่อย

Statement by H.E. Dr. R.M. Marty M. Natalegawa, Indonesian Foreign Minister, Chair of ASEAN, Before the UNSC, New York, 14 February 2011

Split decision, with both claiming victory

Was the UNSC's ruling on the border conflict a win, loss, or draw for Thailand? It depends who you ask.

ป้ายกำกับ