วันเสาร์ที่ 12 กุมภาพันธ์ พ.ศ. 2554


BANGKOK 000192 AMBASSADOR ENGAGES PRIVY COUNCIL CHAIR

Monday, 25 January 2010, 07:59
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 BANGKOK 000192
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP/MLS, NSC FOR WALTON
EO 12958 DECL: 01/25/2030
TAGS PRELPGOVTH
SUBJECT: THAILAND: AMBASSADOR ENGAGES PRIVY COUNCIL CHAIR
PREM, OTHER “ESTABLISHMENT” FIGURES ON YEAR AHEAD
REF: BANGKOK 184 (SEH DAENG)
BANGKOK 00000192 001.2 OF 003
Classified By: Ambassador Eric G. John, reason 1.4 (b,d)
1. (S) Summary: Ambassador paid a series of New Year’s-related calls on influential
Thai figures,including Privy Council Chair GEN Prem, Privy Council member ACM
Siddhi, and former PM Anand,
to discuss the year ahead. Abhisit’s performance, issues related to the royal family,
and challenges posed by Thaksin/Hun Sen emerged as the primary themes. Prem
offered a more positive assessment of Abhisit’s performance than Siddhi, who
criticized Abhisit for a lack of resolve and the absence of an effective team to carry
out his policies. All three focused on the challenge posed by Thaksin to the
government and, indirectly, to the monarchy; Anand attributed part of the King’s
poor health to Thaksin, and both Prem and Siddhi were upset about Thaksin’s
alliance of convenience with Cambodian leader Hun Sen. All three had quite
negative comments about Crown Prince Vajiralongkorn. While asserting that
the Crown Prince will become King, both Siddhi and Anand implied the country
would be better off if other arrangements could be made. Siddhi expressed
preference for Princess Sirindhorn; Anand suggested only the King would
be in a position to change succession, and acknowledged a low likelihood
of that happening.

2. (S) Comment: On the two most difficult and sensitive issues of the day in
Thailand — Thaksin and the monarchy — the Thai elite appear as unsure
about the future as any other sector of society. The stakes are significant for
all sides, and resolution of the political divide and royal succession could
still be far over the horizon. Elite concerns about Abhisit in office appear
to reflect less on his performance than on general worries about the
ultimate resolution of issues. End Summary and Comment.
Mixed Views on Abhisit’s performance
————————————
3. (C) Privy Councilor Chair GEN Prem shared his assessments of PM Abhisit,
the Crown Prince’s relationship with Thaksin, and difficulties dealing with
Cambodia/Hun Sen with Ambassador over lunch January 13. Regarding
Abhisit, Prem referenced widespread criticism that the PM was too young and
not strong enough to be an effective leader in trying times. However, Prem
felt that Abhisit had proved in 2009 that he was up to the challenge of doing
what was necessary to run a fractious coalition government, no easy task.
In addition, there were no other politicians available who were more principled
and had more integrity than Abhisit, and Thailand needed such a leader at this
point. Prem expressed hope that Thais and foreigners alike would be more
patient with Abhisit, who he believed was the right man to serve as premier.
4. (C) Fellow Privy Councilor ACM Siddhi, hosting Ambassador at his home
January 11, was more critical of Abhisit than Prem. Siddhi said that he had told
Abhisit’s father, his own long-time personal physician, that his son needed to
be more decisive and “make more friends” in 2010. Abhisit spent too much time
at the podium and not enough time assembling an effective team to which he
could delegate action and rely on for well-thought out policy initiatives, in Siddhi’s
view. Abhisit also needed to get out to engage the grassroots, one of Thaksin’s
strengths. On Siddhi’s wish list: Abhisit pushing through a permanent appointment
for Acting Police Chief Pratheep; using his power over wayward coalition parties
by threatening parliamentary dissolution if they did not get in line; and telling
the Army to take action to dismiss renegade MGEN Khattiya, even if Defense
Minister Prawit refused to sign a dismissal order.

Political Year Ahead
——————–
5. (C) While GEN Prem expressed moderate concern about the potential for violence
and political discord in early 2010, he felt the situation was no worse than six
months ago. Prem asked about U.S. laws regarding demonstrations and avoiding
excessive disruptions of government functions and daily lives of citizens; Ambassador
explained the U.S. system of permits for protests which allowed for free speech but not
free access everywhere. Ambassador shared U.S. frustration about decisions negatively
affecting economic/investment climate, such as Ma Tha Phut and the digital lottery
cancellation; the uneven application of the rule of law, breaches of contract, and
regulatory shifts affected the investment climate more negatively at this point than
political turmoil.

6. (C) ACM Siddhi expressed more concerns than Prem about the security situation
in 2010, suggesting that Army Commander Anupong’s inability to control wayward
red-affiliated MGEN Khattiya’s M-79 attacks on yellow-shirt rallies and trips to
see Thaksin overseas was not a good harbinger (note: three days later, someone
attacked Anupong’s office at night with an M-79, with Khattiya widely seen as the
likely suspect, see reftel. End note). Siddhi said he had higher hopes for deputy
Commander Prayuth, widely expected to replace Anupong in October and seen as
particularly close to the Queen. Siddhi claimed Prem had sent a signal of his
displeasure with Anupong by snubbing him during a group call at Prem’s residence
to pass birthday greetings, not stopping to talk to Anupong personally as he did
with other key military commanders.

Royal Family: King, Crown Prince, Entourages
——————————————–
7. (S) Regarding King Bhumibol’s health, Prem indicated that the King was
exercising 30 minutes a day on a stationary bicycle at Siriraj Hospital and
passing a medicine ball with a physical therapist to build up strength and
regain weight. Prem acknowledged that he had not seen the King since the
hospitalization, but that the Queen and Princess Sirindhorn saw the King
daily. When Ambassador asked about the Crown Prince’s involvement,
Prem repeated: the Queen and Sirindhorn visit him daily.

8. (S) Prem acknowledged Crown Prince Vajiralongkorn probably maintained
some sort of relationship with fugitive former PM Thaksin, “seeing him from
time to time.” Prem, clearly no fan of either man, cautioned that Thaksin ran
the risk of self-delusion if he thought that the Crown Prince would act as his
friend/supporter in the future merely because of Thaksin’s monetary support;
“he does not enjoy that sort of relationship.” When Ambassador asked where
the Crown Prince was currently, in Thailand or Europe, Prem replied
dismissively: “You know his social life, how he is.” (Note: a presumed reference
to Vajiralongkorn’s preference to spend time based out of Munich with his
main mistress, rather than in Thailand with his wife and son).

9. (S) ACM Siddhi, in a similar vein, noted that the Crown Prince frequently slipped
away from Thailand, and that information about his air hostess mistresses was
widely available on websites; he lamented how his former aide, now Thai
Ambassador to Germany, was forced to leave Berlin for Munich often to receive
Vajiralongkorn. Siddhi raised Thaksin’s controversial November Times
On-line interview, which Siddhi claimed cast the King in a bad light and
attempted to praise the Crown Prince as broad-minded and educated abroad,
hinting that Vajiralongkorn would be ready to welcome Thaksin back to
Thailand once he became King.

10. (S) Ambassador mentioned to Siddhi the Crown Prince’s more engaging
approach in the early December King’s Birthday reception with Ambassadors,
shaking each envoy’s hand and appearing more at ease than in the 2008
reception. Siddhi stated that succession would be a difficult transition time
for Thailand. According to Palace Law, the Crown Prince would succeed
his father, but added after a pause, almost hopefully: “if the Crown Prince
were to die, anything could happen, and maybe Prathep (Sirindhorn)
could succeed.”

11. (S) Ambassador similarly raised the Crown Prince’s more confident
demeanor with former PM Anand in late December, seeking Anand’s
assessment of the dynamics in play as succession inevitably drew nearer.
Anand’s response was similar to Siddhi’s, but more detailed and blunt.
Anand said that he had always believed that the Crown Prince would succeed
his father, according to law. However, there could be complicating factors –
if Vajiralongkohn proved unable to stay out of politics, or avoid embarrassing
financial transactions. After a pause, Anand added that the consensus view
among many Thai was that the Crown Prince could not stop either, nor
would he be able, at age 57, to rectify his behavior. After another pause, Anand
added that someone really should raise the matter with the King, before adding
with regret that there really was no one who could raise such a delicate topic
(note: implied was the need for an alternative to Vajiralongkorn).

12. (S) ACM Siddhi expressed his personal concern about the declining image of
the royal family in Thailand, noting that something as simple as excessive
motorcade-related traffic jams caused by minor royals was an unnecessary
but enduring irritant. Personal Private Secretary Arsa Sarasin had raised this
with the King about eight years ago, according to Siddhi, and the King had agreed,
authorizing Arsa to talk to royal family members and to set up new rules limiting
entourages and occasions when traffic would be stopped. Nothing had changed;
Siddhi noted that he had been caught up in traffic for 45 minutes the previous
week returning for a meeting with the Chinese Ambassador, due to a royal
motorcade. Stories that the Crown Prince now ordered second story windows
closed as his motorcade passed achieved nothing but additional popular r
esentment, Siddhi added sorrowfully.

Thaksin and Hun Sen
——————-
13. (C) Thaksin clearly remained on the mind of all three “establishment” figures.
Former PM Anand asserted that the King’s health and mood remained poor
“primarily because of Thaksin” and the challenge Thaksin posed to the stability
of the country. GEN Prem asked Ambassador what the U.S. would do in the
situation Thailand found itself, with a neighboring country appointing as an
adviser a former leader bent on bringing down the government. Ambassador
replied that while former U.S. Presidents did occasionally give paid speeches
overseas, they would never work for another government; he advised Prem and
Thai officials to take the high road in their public comments about Cambodia,
and not to be drawn into a tit for tat with Thaksin and Hun Sen. (Note: Prem
seemed to be musing out loud, but he clearly was focused on what he perceived
as a threat from Thaksin and Hun Sen’s facilitation of Thaksin’s efforts).

14. (C) ACM Siddhi said that PM Abhisit had called him on his 90th birthday
recently and had indicated that now that Thailand was no longer ASEAN Chair,
Abhisit would feel less constrained in responding to Hun Sen’s bullying rhetoric
more freely. Siddhi expressed concern that in addition to Cambodia and Brunei,
clearly in Thaksin’s camp due to his close personal ties with Hun Sen and the
Brunei Sultan, Laos and Vietnam might back Hun Sen in the ongoing
Thai-Cambodia diplomatic spat.

15. (C) ACM Siddhi attacked Thaksin as trying to use money, red-shirt protests,
and Hun Sen to “destroy our country,” but he predicted Thaksin would not succeed.
Thaksin never had tried to negotiate, Siddhi alleged, but only issued demands;
had he been willing to come back and spend a nominal time in jail for his conviction,
Thaksin likely would have been quickly pardoned/released as a former PM. Now
Thaksin would try to create chaos, possibly sparking the use of force. While Siddhi
expected Thaksin to lose the February 26 decision on his 76 billion baht ($2.3 billion)
in frozen assets, he claimed his sources indicated Thaksin still had 240 billion baht
($7.3 billion) overseas. Rather than live overseas quietly, Thaksin had decided to
fight, funding websites attacking the King and Queen to stir up
anti-monarchy views. JOHN

ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:

แสดงความคิดเห็น